Notes to Feminist Philosophy of Language

2. See, for example, Erlich & King 1998: 168; Gastil 1990; Martyna 1978; Moulton, Robinson, & Elias 1978; Wilson & Ng 1988. There have been some criticisms of this research in Cole, Hill, & Dayley 1983. But see also the response to these criticisms in Gastil 1990.

3. For more on discursive constructivism, see also the section on Feminist Postmodernism in the entry on feminist epistemology and philosophy of science.

4. See also the section on Feminist Critiques and Conceptions of Objectivity in the entry on feminist epistemology and philosophy of science.

Copyright © 2017 by
Jennifer Saul <j.saul@shef.ac.uk>
Esa Diaz-Leon <esadiazleon@gmail.com>

This is a file in the archives of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Please note that some links may no longer be functional.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]